As a Marketing Director, customer acquisition is my top priority. Yet, I see Web3 solutions consistently missing the mark. Too many projects target crypto insiders, builders, traders, or early adopters, while ignoring the everyday user. If Web3 is serious about mass adoption, it needs to answer some hard questions and shift its approach. Here’s what I’m seeing, and what needs to change.
The Mass Adoption Gap: Are We There Yet?
It’s been over a decade since Ethereum’s 2014 launch and since then, Web3 advocates have promised mass adoption. But with only 6.8% of internet users engaging with Web3 in 2024, progress is at a standstill in my opinion. Why? Most projects aren’t built for the average person. They assume users understand wallets, gas fees, or decentralization. Concepts alien to someone just trying to stream music or scroll social media.
Take Starbucks’ NFT-based loyalty program. It works because it’s simple: customers earn rewards without needing a crypto crash course. Contrast that with clunky DeFi apps requiring multiple steps to connect a wallet. The lesson? Web3 must meet users where they are, not where developers wish they’d be.
Question: How long will we keep talking about mass adoption without real progress? What’s being done to onboard everyday users?
Are Web3 Products Built for the Everyday Person?
Most Web3 products feel like and are designed for crypto enthusiasts, not the general public. Would the average Joe know how to use a decentralized social platform? Probably not. The UX is often intimidating and requires multiple tricky steps (think token bridging or gas fees). Compare that to Web2 apps like Instagram, where signing up takes seconds.
Question: Are Web3 products intuitive enough for someone who’s never heard of crypto? If not, how do we expect adoption?
Do Web3 Solutions Outshine Web2 Alternatives?
People stick to the same five apps. Think categories such as social media, streaming, job searches—because they’re convenient and familiar. Web browsing has changed drastically over the years and even new Web2 startups struggle to break through, so where does that leave Web3? To win users, Web3 must offer something significantly better, not just decentralized.
In some cases, it does. Web3 gaming lets players own assets, unlike traditional games. NFT-based loyalty programs, like Gucci’s, add unique engagement. But too often, Web3 sacrifices usability for ideology. A decentralized app that’s slower than its Web2 counterpart won’t cut it. Users don’t care about “trustless systems”, they care about speed and ease. They don’t even understand what trustless systems are. They think that it means the opposite and that it’s telling you NOT to trust.
Question: Is the Web3 version compelling enough to pull users from their go-to apps? If not, what’s the incentive to switch?
A Marketing Wake-Up Call
I love Web3’s potential, but the space needs a reality check. If I, a Marketing Director, can’t find clear answers to these questions, how will the general public? Web3 must prioritize customer acquisition with:
- Simpler UX: Hide the crypto complexity. Make onboarding as easy as downloading an app.
- Better Storytelling: Market benefits, not tech. “Own your data” beats “decentralized identity.”
- Real-World Use Cases: Partner with brands or industries to integrate Web3 into daily life, like Spotify’s NFT experiments.
- Education Without Jargon: Teach users why Web3 matters in ways they already understand.
Yes, there’s some progress. Consumer chains designed for specific use cases (e.g., gaming, social) are simplifying Web3. AI-driven interfaces let users interact via chat, no wallet required. But we need more, and we need it faster.
As marketers, we must bridge the gap between Web3’s promise and its reality. Let’s stop preaching to the crypto choir and start building for the masses.
Leave a Reply